Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-03-31 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-03-31 House Journal Page 3147 HB 514 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March 29, 2004, calendar (page 3119), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 514(FIN) am "An Act relating to child support modification and enforcement, to the establishment of paternity by the child support enforcement agency, and to the crimes of criminal nonsupport and aiding the nonpayment of child support; amending Rule 90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 514(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 3. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Gruenberg, McGuire, and Kott: 2004-03-31 House Journal Page 3148 Page 6, lines 17 - 18: Delete ", or the mother's parent or legal guardian if the mother is a minor or incompetent," Insert "is legally competent and" Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Hawker objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 3 was adopted. Representative Hawker placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Meyer be excused from a call of the House to 1:30 p.m. today. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall CSHB 514(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 514(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wolf Nays: Croft, Foster, Holm, Stoltze Excused: Meyer Absent: Wilson And so, CSHB 514(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2004-03-31 House Journal Page 3149 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 514(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.